Author Topic: Photo Etched for type IIA 1/72 or IIB 1/144  (Read 7410 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Oto Gerza

  • Guest
Re: Photo Etched for type IIA 1/72 or IIB 1/144
« Reply #15 on: 19 Nov , 2014, 09:00 »

Here is my calculation of 35 mm.
Anyone who has literature Vom original zum modell it can verify.

Offline dougie47

  • Administrator
  • *
  • Posts: 758
Re: Photo Etched for type IIA 1/72 or IIB 1/144
« Reply #16 on: 19 Nov , 2014, 10:03 »
Hello Oto,
Why didn't you post this straight away? You could easily have posted this last night or the night before. Or were you frantically trying to find a plan?
I'm no longer surpised by some of the silly things you have posted and this is another example (this time the palm of my hand involuntarily moved from my mouse and smacked off my forehead in disbelief). You have marked on in red text "34.5mm". You could actually have written 35mm and most folks will have believed you. More importantly, if you measured 34.5mm why did you make your set 35mm?
Your scan is from the small plan in Vom Original book and this makes it difficult to calculate an exact figure. If you had the real plan printed off in 72nd scale you would find in is 34.84cm. (I guess my calculations from period photos must have been 0.16mm off)
It took me an hour to remove all your advertisements and posts last night. I'll leave this one on but any not just for intellectual property theft. In consideration of other members I shall be polite so can I perhaps suggest that you might try rebuilding your reputation elsewhere? 
Dougie
 
 

Oto Gerza

  • Guest
Re: Photo Etched for type IIA 1/72 or IIB 1/144
« Reply #17 on: 19 Nov , 2014, 13:13 »

I originally due to translation did not know what you mean by 35 mm.
I do not know what is the real dimension to the etching modelbrass. I've never seen this etching live.

A friend told me that Revell has torpedo chamber about 7 mm longer than the reality.
I did not know, and I looked into drawings.
So I did.
I checked it out through drawing vom original zum model and others literatur.
I did not know there Revell has such a mistake.

If I knew exactly what you mean by dimension, now I've put this image.
I'm tired of it here.
I'll say it straight
you my etchings are just a project for my friends and me.
One person from AMP forum begged me he drew type VIID.
I want you also want to build the type of VIID.


conclusion:
Our etchings are a few euro more expensive. Your etchings are cheaper including instructions. So I recommend everyone to buy your etchings AMP.
I'm making the most of his etchings for themselves and their friends here in the Czech Republic.



In our forum consult with friends who do etched part still add and what to change. We make it with others.
Some etched parts are still shortcomings. I still regulates etched deck.
I need to have a deck with holes. RC Submarine better then immersed in water.
When dipping air must leave the deck!
Hand holes it takes me as much time as propose etching.
Openings for hull wanted modellers static model for my friends


I'm here to show my work.
Again, I write my etchings are expensive. The development we put money together with the guys.



I'm sorry that you've deleted my posts hour.
I already do not want to present here.
Otherwise, I wish you much success and modelers here.
« Last Edit: 19 Nov , 2014, 13:44 by Oto Gerza »

Offline dougie47

  • Administrator
  • *
  • Posts: 758
Re: Photo Etched for type IIA 1/72 or IIB 1/144
« Reply #18 on: 19 Nov , 2014, 14:35 »
Hello Oto,
We have both had our say so it is time close this thread.
Dougie